This situation played out recently with a developer working on a multi-family project in a small rural town just outside of Winnipeg. He had a solid concept, capital was in place, the property was owned, and he was ready to move. It was mid-July, and the other contractors he’d spoken with had all assured him a fall start was absolutely doable.
His excitement was understandable, but no one was asking the harder questions:
- What does the timeline for drawings actually look like? Does this project require civil drawings, and have you factored in that timeline?
- Has the road & infrastructure been completed, and will the city issue permits?
- Have you thought through the layout carefully enough to ensure your future tenants will be comfortable and stay long-term?
That last point matters more than it might seem. The ultimate goal of a revenue property is long-term tenancy and strong returns. Rushing through design decisions early on can undermine that goal for years to come. Once the full picture was laid out for this developer, a few important realities came into focus.
Winter construction costs: Missing the window to start before winter in Manitoba means real additional expenses like heating, hoarding, excavation, and messy spring clean-up. These aren’t minor line items; they can meaningfully affect the project’s bottom line.
Limited subcontractor availability: By mid-July, the best subcontractors who deliver quality work at a reasonable price, were already committed to fall projects. Pushing ahead on a rushed timeline would have meant working with whoever was still available, potentially at a premium price and with less desirable outcomes.
A false start is worse than a delayed start: If the owner and developer had pushed ahead anyway, these hard realities would have caught up with him later in the process, only at that point, he would have already spent the time, money, and momentum getting there